Stop Flip-Flopping Your Way to Career Suicide: A No-Nonsense Guide to Decision Making

Related Articles:

• SkillGrid Blog
• Workplace Abuse Training

The meeting room went dead silent when Sarah announced she needed "just another week" to decide on the vendor selection. Third time this month. The project timeline? Shot. Team morale? In the gutter. Her reputation? Let's just say it wasn't trending upward.

After 18 years in business consulting across Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth, I've watched more promising careers derail because of chronic indecisiveness than any other single factor. And here's what really gets my goat - most of these people were bloody brilliant. They just couldn't pull the trigger when it mattered.

The Real Cost of Waffling

Let me be brutally honest here. Indecisiveness isn't just annoying - it's expensive. Studies show that organisations with decisive leadership perform 47% better financially than those led by chronic deliberators. But that's just the tip of the iceberg.

I remember working with a mid-sized Melbourne manufacturing firm where the CEO took eight months to approve a new inventory system. Eight months! By the time they finally moved, their main competitor had already captured 23% of their market share with a similar system they'd implemented in six weeks.

The ripple effects are devastating. Teams lose confidence in leadership. Projects stagnate. Opportunities vanish faster than free drinks at a Friday night function.

Why Smart People Make Stupid Delays

Here's the thing that drives me mental - indecisive people often think they're being thorough. "I'm just gathering more information," they say. Bollocks. You're procrastinating with extra steps.

The perfectionist trap catches loads of high achievers. They want every decision to be flawless, which is about as realistic as expecting Melbourne weather to be predictable. But here's what I've learned from training hundreds of executives: good decisions made quickly beat perfect decisions made too late. Every. Single. Time.

Fear of regret is another massive roadblock. People imagine the worst-case scenario of making the wrong choice, but they completely ignore the worst-case scenario of making no choice at all.

I've seen this particularly with financial advisors I've worked with. They'll spend weeks analysing investment options for clients while missing time-sensitive opportunities. The irony? Their indecision costs clients more than most "wrong" decisions would have.

The 70% Rule That Changed Everything

About five years ago, I started teaching what I call the 70% Rule. If you have 70% of the information you think you need, make the bloody decision.

Why 70%? Because that's the sweet spot where you have enough data to be confident but haven't wasted time chasing diminishing returns. Amazon's Jeff Bezos swears by something similar - he calls it "disagree and commit" decision-making.

The pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson famously uses this approach. When they were developing their COVID vaccine, they didn't wait for 100% certainty before committing resources. They moved at 70% confidence and adjusted course as needed. Result? One of the fastest vaccine developments in history.

But here's where most people stuff it up - they think this means being reckless. Wrong. The 70% Rule requires preparation and frameworks, not gut feelings and crossed fingers.

The DECIDE Framework (And Why It Actually Works)

After years of trial and error, I've refined a decision-making process that cuts through the noise:

D - Define the problem clearly (most people skip this and wonder why they're confused) E - Explore alternatives (limit yourself to 3-5 options maximum) C - Consider consequences (best case, worst case, most likely case) I - Identify your values and priorities D - Decide and act E - Evaluate and learn from the outcome

The beauty of this system? It forces you to think without overthinking.

Let me give you a real example. A Brisbane-based IT director I coached was agonising over choosing between three project management software options. Using DECIDE, we defined the core problem (team coordination breakdowns), explored the top three solutions, mapped consequences, identified their priority (ease of integration over fancy features), decided in one day, and implemented within a week.

Eighteen months later? Team productivity up 34%, project delivery improved by 28%. More importantly, the director gained a reputation as someone who gets things done.

When Speed Trumps Perfection

Look, I'll admit something here - I used to be one of those consultants who'd analyse everything to death. Spreadsheets, SWOT analyses, risk matrices. My clients' eyes would glaze over while I droned on about contingency planning.

Then I worked with a startup founder who made decisions faster than I could finish explaining the options. His success rate? About 80%. My over-analysed recommendations? Maybe 85%. The difference in speed to market? He was crushing competitors while I was still preparing presentations.

That's when it hit me - in most business situations, speed of execution beats perfection of planning.

The retail sector taught me this lesson hard. Fashion retailers like Zara don't spend months perfecting designs - they get products to market in weeks and adjust based on sales data. Meanwhile, traditional retailers are still holding focus groups while Zara's already moved on to the next trend.

The Confidence Paradox

Here's something counterintuitive: making decisions quickly actually builds confidence, not the other way around. Most people think they need confidence to decide fast, but it's backwards.

Every decision you make, regardless of outcome, gives you data. That data builds pattern recognition. Pattern recognition builds intuition. Intuition enables faster, better decisions. It's a virtuous cycle, but you have to start somewhere.

I've noticed this particularly with the workplace harassment training sessions I facilitate. Managers who practice quick decision-making in role-playing scenarios become dramatically more confident handling real situations. But the ones who deliberate endlessly during practice? They freeze when it matters.

Decision Fatigue Is Real (And Brutal)

Barack Obama only wore blue or grey suits as President. Why? Decision fatigue. Steve Jobs wore the same black turtleneck daily. Mark Zuckerberg has a closet full of identical grey t-shirts.

These aren't quirks - they're strategic choices. Every trivial decision you make drains your mental energy for important ones.

I started applying this principle with executives I work with. We identify their "non-negotiable" daily decisions - outfit choices, lunch options, meeting structures - and standardise them. Suddenly, they have more mental bandwidth for the decisions that actually matter.

One Perth-based CEO I mentored cut his average decision-making time from three days to three hours simply by eliminating 27 routine decisions from his daily workflow. His team's response? They started bringing him the big problems instead of suffering in silence.

The Regret Minimisation Test

Amazon's founder Jeff Bezos talks about his "regret minimisation framework." When facing tough decisions, he imagines himself at 80 years old, looking back. Which choice would he regret more - trying and failing, or never trying at all?

This shifted my entire perspective on stress reduction strategies for clients. Most workplace stress comes from avoiding decisions, not making wrong ones.

Think about it. When did you last lose sleep over a quick decision that didn't work out perfectly? Probably never. But I bet you've stayed awake worrying about decisions you keep postponing.

What Nobody Tells You About "Wrong" Decisions

The dirty secret of decision-making? Most "wrong" decisions aren't actually wrong - they're just different paths to similar destinations.

Five years ago, I chose to focus my practice on leadership development instead of general management consulting. Some colleagues thought I was mad - the market seemed more competitive. But that "risky" decision led to higher-value clients, more specialised expertise, and better work-life balance.

Was it the "right" decision? Impossible to know. Would the alternative have been "wrong"? Unlikely. Both paths had merit; one just aligned better with my priorities.

The point is this: agonising over the "perfect" choice often means missing the reality that multiple good choices exist.

Practical Tools for Chronic Ditherers

If you're still reading this, you're probably one of those people who researches "how to research better" instead of just making a choice. Fair dinkum, let's fix this.

Set artificial deadlines. Give yourself half the time you think you need. Force urgency where none exists naturally.

Use the 10-10-10 rule. How will you feel about this decision in 10 minutes, 10 months, and 10 years? Usually reveals which decisions actually matter.

Flip a coin. Not to decide, but to notice your gut reaction to the result. If you're hoping for heads while it's in the air, that's your answer.

Phone a friend - specifically, someone who doesn't overthink. Get their read in 30 seconds. Fresh perspective cuts through your mental clutter.

The Bottom Line

Look, indecisiveness masquerades as prudence, but it's actually fear wearing a business suit. Every day you delay making a decision is a day your competitors aren't waiting around.

I've seen too many talented people plateau because they couldn't choose a direction and commit to it. Their careers became museums of missed opportunities and "what if" stories.

The most successful leaders I work with share one trait: they're comfortable being wrong but absolutely allergic to being slow. They understand that course correction beats course paralysis every single time.

Stop researching your way to irrelevance. Your future self will thank you for the chances you took, not the risks you avoided.

Make the call. You've got this.